fbpx

Ferrari Swapped Subaru Rally Car Shakedown

After dyno tuning with John Reed of John Reed Racing, we were set to do a test day out near the Olympus Rally roads the weekend after. Unfortunately, a heavy winter storm pelted the Pacific Northwest just a few days before forcing the organizers to postpone the test day. Disappointed, yet understanding of the situation, I had to at least get the car out to see how it felt. Parking lot drifts anyone?

Alright, so I agree with the postponement of the test day. It’s meant for teams to prep for the Olympus Rally and snow and gravel rally tires really just don’t get along. While not the sensational debut I was looking for, it was still fun to get the car out nonetheless.

In lieu of some forest roads to stretch the car’s newfound legs, I called up DirtFish to see if it would be possible to spend a few hours slinging gravel… they thankfully obliged.

Keeping the car cool was my biggest concern.”

The biggest concern for me was the cooling system. The car had mostly proven itself on the dyno as being able to run and deliver power without issue. It held the temperature, and despite the driveshaft failure (entirely my fault), the day went relatively smoothly. At the dyno, it was freezing cold out and each of the power runs was relatively short. It would be a different story entirely to have prolonged runs with various ground speeds to send air cooling down the motor. Prior to the shakedown, I hadn’t installed any air feed vents to the radiator. As a reminder, due to the increased size of the engine, I had to install the radiator in the back of the car similar to top-level rallycross or drift cars. I wanted to experiment and see how much venting I really needed. While I hoped for none, that proved to not be the case.

While the car did get a little hot, there was nothing egregious. Moving through a series of opening windows and roof vents, ultimately it took removing one of the rear door windows to keep the temperatures stable.

Photo by Romain Beaulieu/DirtFish

Probably one of the most common comments I receive on social media is how badly it’s going to handle with the “massive” V8 up front. If you remember from one of the previous build videos, the car clocked in with a 57% weight distribution. That makes it nearly identical to the weight distribution in its previous form. The only caveat is that I now have to run with a 50kg weight penalty in order to stay within the rules. This is ultimately a bummer as we all know lighter cars just generally do everything better.

Now DirtFish is not without its limitations. As a school, the roads are designed to keep speeds reasonable which means the roads are generally pretty tight. My car has always been fairly difficult to drive there owing mostly to the aggressive diff setup I like to run all around. I’d fail miserably at rallycross if I kept that setup. This causes the car to be a bit of a chore to handle at low speeds and sharp corners with the benefit of excellent grip and stability at high speeds. I was expecting the same outcome.

I did have one ace up my sleeve though. Previously I ran the Subaru’s center differential at full lock with only a cut out for when the handbrake was pulled. With the new Motec M1 ECU I am running with the Ferrari engine, I now have the benefit of greater control over the center diff. I came up with a “loose” map prior to the shakedown that would let the car favor far more torque distribution to the rear than I would normally run. It worked.

Overall I would say the car mostly handles the same as it did before except that I can feel that added weight while under braking coming into the corners. The best part of this setup however is the ability to control the overall power output. As a naturally aspirated V8, everything feels linear and you get exactly what you ask for. Need to go a little wider, add some throttle. Want to get a little tighter, ease off a bit and drag the brakes. The inputs are the same with any AWD car, but the fidelity is nothing like the turbo motor. With how aggressive the torque would come on, it was a bit of a guessing game as to what you would get. This is where left foot braking really comes in handy as you can dampen the effects, but that’s just addressing the symptoms.

“The power delivery is phenomonal!”

What you might be wondering is how much faster it is. I can say that it certainly feels quicker than the old version of the car but it’s not out of this world uncontrollable power. Sure, I hooned a bit during the shakedown video (who wouldn’t?) but I would say it just feels like what I want it to feel like. Consistent, smooth, and utterly fantastic. The new motor makes far less torque than the EJ25 did but makes up for it in high RPM horsepower. This results in a beautiful torque curve at the wheels that I just can’t wait to feel at the Olympus Rally in April.

Before I go, I need to mention the obvious; the sound. While it might not be everyone’s favorite, videos just can’t do it justice. Those spectating at the shakedown continued to bring up two observations. You hear the car twice. First, as it comes navigating through the course, and again as it echoes off the hills. Olympus and Oregon Trail Rally spectators will be treated to a symphony of flat-plane madness. The second…

If you’re like me, your favorite part of going to watch fireworks is not the sight, or even really the sound… it’s the feel. A few fellow DirtFish instructors got up close and personal with the action and reported feeling the percussion of the exhaust exiting the side piped exhaust as it came by. You’re welcome, but follow the rally marshall’s instructions.

See you all at the Olympus Rally on April 22-23! If you haven’t yet, check out my YouTube Channel and watch the F136 Build Series!

Development Resumes for Olympus Rally

Well, we all know it’s been a tough year and for us, it’s been no different. Luckily though, it looks like we will finally get to go rally this year at the rescheduled Olympus Rally on November 14-15th in Shelton, Washington. We started 2020 with some ambitious plans for development of the car with majorly revised bodywork, geometry, and suspension. Unfortunately due to the pandemic, a lot of that was put hold. The car has been in storage for the better part of the year after it was vandalized by some opportunistic thieves who also walked away with some of our spare parts and tools including a brand new Garrett Turbo. On top of those losses, the financial hit of the economy also slowed down progress. Despite this, and thanks to our sponsor, Method Race Wheels, we will still be able to make some progress towards our goals!

So what’s happening?

Widetrack v1: In my post earlier this year, you got to see a hint of some bodywork development. This is still happening. Expect to see modern WRC inspired front fenders and widened rear quarter panels. Eventually I hope to have these made in kevlar, but for Olympus we will most likely have metal prototypes for fenders and FRP quarter panels. This will make the car strikingly different in appearance with a nod to the Group B era. However, the looks are just a byproduct of the end goal; more grip! By the regulations, the wheels and tires need to be covered by the bodywork when looking from the top of the car just like most road rules. What that means is we are widening the overall width of the care to contain the increased track of the vehicle. How much wider? Let’s take a look:

Geometry Comparison
Stock Dimensions Compared to WRC Regulation Width

At the time of this writing, the American Rally Association doesn’t place a restriction on the overall width of the vehicle. In the FIA however, they increased the overall width in 2017 from 1820mm to 1875mm. If we use that as a reference, that gives us about 135mm we can grow into. That’s a lot and wider is better to an extent. Here’s what an additional 60mm per side looks like up front:

Wide Fender Prototype
Front Group B Era Inspired Fenders

So, with this additional body width we will be able to increase our track width with the goal of increasing overall grip. My original plan was to go with bespoke uprights and incorporate longer dampers to get extra wheel travel. That as you can imagine is a bit expensive. For the time being I’m converting to 5×114 uprights and bolt in hubs to get stronger bearings. We’ve had our fair share of wheel bearing failures from the inferior 5×100 bearings including our wheel completely detaching at Pacific Forest Rally last year, so this was a needed change anyway. This also allows us to keep our current Reigers with only a change to the lower perches up front to accept the larger 5×114 uprights. Big thanks to Blaze at Reiger Suspension USA for getting us those parts.

With the change to 5×114, the first step to going wider will be incorporating a different offset wheel from our sponsor, Method Race Wheels. They will setting us up with the MR502 VT-Spec rally wheel. Our original MR501 VT-Spec has an offset of +48mm whereas the MR502 has an offset of +15mm. There’s the first 66mm of extra track width and that’s where v1 of this project will end with no change to the control arms, tie rods, axles, etc. Yes… it’ll look a little funky not filling up the body work.

Method Race Wheels MR502 VT-Spec
The Method Race Wheels MR502 VT-Spec

The Future: Widetrack v2

Now, it’s not quite as easy as throwing on some lower offset wheels and calling it a day. This has implications on the suspension geometry that needs to be addressed. The most affected will be Scrub Radius. Admittedly, there’s not much I can do about it in v1 aside from adjusting ride height but that’s where v2 comes in.

In v2, I’ll be looking at fabricating custom control arms, figuring out a way to incorporate front uprights on the rear, correcting all the geometry, etc. I’ll save that for a different post, but those changes will likely occur in 2021. I have some of the designs already made, but I need to dive deeper into the kinematics to get as close as possible to the end result to reduce the amount of rework that is likely to occur.

More Boost!

Aside from getting v1 ready for Olympus, we’re going to get back on the dyno. Last year we only tuned the car to 2.5bar (21.75psig) of boost to stay within CRC’s rule and anticipating ARA lowering their boost limits. ARA ended up abandoning that rule change so now we have the ability to increase boost up to 2.86bar (27psig). This will be pushing the efficiency of our Garrett turbo so I’ll be working on a better intercooler to help control intake air temperature. It will also take a bit of tinkering with target boost and ignition timing to see where we actually make the most power with our current setup.

That’s it for now, but Krista and I are beyond excited to finally get back in the car together and compete. Look for progress updates on my Instagram and Facebook page and I’ll create another blog post when v1 is complete!